![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
| |||||||
| UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited. |
|
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Richard Crowley" wrote in message . .. Trev wrote: Post lip sync will be a pain even if you well up on Video and editing so Forget the Separate devise. That is the opposite of my experience. Even multi-camera productions of live music are quite easy to "pull-up" the video to match the audio track. Especially for short shots such as the OP is suggesting, using a separate sound recording seems like an excellent way of working around the problem of a camera without a mic input. I use that very technique quite regularly. I agree. A suggestion: for each scene/take, use the old-fashioned film "trick" of using a "clapper" (one stick hinged on another or on a board that something can be written on) at the beginning. The closing of the gap between the clapper parts and the spike in the audio track from the resulting sound can be easily synchronized in a high magnification view of the timeline in a video editor. The Camcorder you have Is Not very good Quality. But try it with really good lighting before deciding it isn't good enough for what you need to do. Again, I agree. But since YouTube now permits 16x9 "HD" (well, kinda.....;-) images that are surprisingly decent, it may be worth, at least eventually, an HD camcorder to shoot this (especially if reasonably high quality stills are to be included). --DR |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|