![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
| |||||||
| UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I have a 12 year old Hi-8 Sony camcorder and wish to upgrade to a newer model. I have searched the web but cannot find good camcorder review sites or talk about pro and cons of the media types. Can anyone help please? Incedently I quite like the Sony SR72 HDD but have not seen a review of it yet. Have seen some US reviews but the model numbers look different to UK so am not too sure about comparision. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:05:06 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: Try: www.camcorderinfo.com You want to get a MiniDV model. Thanks. Seen this site before - still difficult to compare UK available models here as the products appear to be different. e.g. SR72 is not mentioned at all. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| In article , wrote: On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:05:06 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: Try: www.camcorderinfo.com You want to get a MiniDV model. Thanks. Seen this site before - still difficult to compare UK available models here as the products appear to be different. e.g. SR72 is not mentioned at all. True - some vendors e.g. Canon use different product codes in the US. You have to go through the vendor's list of products and find the one that looks like the the one you are interested in - compare chip size, etc. I did that when when getting my MVX35 which turns out to be the Optura 500 or something. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:05:06 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: In article , wrote: Try: www.camcorderinfo.com You want to get a MiniDV model. Interesting - you have recommended a MiniDV which I had ignored in the first instance as it has ben around for a long time and I, rightly or wrongly, considered it to be old technology. Having thought about it, I am now inclined to go for a MiniDV as you suggested as there seems to be very good spec ones available for the price of the lower end HDD ones. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In article , wrote: On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:05:06 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: In article , wrote: Try: www.camcorderinfo.com You want to get a MiniDV model. Interesting - you have recommended a MiniDV which I had ignored in the first instance as it has ben around for a long time and I, rightly or wrongly, considered it to be old technology. Having thought about it, I am now inclined to go for a MiniDV as you suggested as there seems to be very good spec ones available for the price of the lower end HDD ones. It may be "old" technology, but it's *better* technology than DVD or HDD, as it does less compression in the camera. You want to do as little work in the camera as possible, since it has to be done in real time. When you post-process the video later, you have the advantage of much more powerful processors and as much time as you need for the compression software to do a good job. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:30 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: It may be "old" technology, but it's *better* technology than DVD or HDD, as it does less compression in the camera. You want to do as little work in the camera as possible, since it has to be done in real time. When you post-process the video later, you have the advantage of much more powerful processors and as much time as you need for the compression software to do a good job. Yeah. And not just "better" the way Betamax was "better" than VHS. Mini-dv is still very much alive and kicking. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:30 +0100, Tim Streater wrote: It may be "old" technology, but it's *better* technology than DVD or HDD, as it does less compression in the camera. You want to do as little work in the camera as possible, since it has to be done in real time. When you post-process the video later, you have the advantage of much more powerful processors and as much time as you need for the compression software to do a good job. Thanks guys. Any recommendation for a make, model please? i am looking for a budget of up to £300. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|