A Home Video forum. Digital Video Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Digital Video Banter forum » Digital Video Newsgroups » UK Digital Video
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited.

Camcorder : DVD v HDD



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 10th 07, 09:28 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
a@aol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Camcorder : DVD v HDD


I have a 12 year old Hi-8 Sony camcorder and wish to upgrade to a
newer model. I have searched the web but cannot find good camcorder
review sites or talk about pro and cons of the media types.

Can anyone help please? Incedently I quite like the Sony SR72 HDD but
have not seen a review of it yet. Have seen some US reviews but the
model numbers look different to UK so am not too sure about
comparision.
  #3  
Old June 10th 07, 11:27 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
a@aol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Camcorder : DVD v HDD

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:05:06 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

Try:

www.camcorderinfo.com

You want to get a MiniDV model.


Thanks. Seen this site before - still difficult to compare UK
available models here as the products appear to be different. e.g.
SR72 is not mentioned at all.
  #4  
Old June 10th 07, 11:34 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Tim Streater
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Camcorder : DVD v HDD

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:05:06 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

Try:

www.camcorderinfo.com

You want to get a MiniDV model.


Thanks. Seen this site before - still difficult to compare UK
available models here as the products appear to be different. e.g.
SR72 is not mentioned at all.


True - some vendors e.g. Canon use different product codes in the US.
You have to go through the vendor's list of products and find the one
that looks like the the one you are interested in - compare chip size,
etc. I did that when when getting my MVX35 which turns out to be the
Optura 500 or something.
  #5  
Old June 10th 07, 07:17 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
a@aol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Camcorder : DVD v HDD

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:05:06 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

In article ,
wrote:

Try:

www.camcorderinfo.com

You want to get a MiniDV model.


Interesting - you have recommended a MiniDV which I had ignored in the
first instance as it has ben around for a long time and I, rightly or
wrongly, considered it to be old technology. Having thought about it,
I am now inclined to go for a MiniDV as you suggested as there seems
to be very good spec ones available for the price of the lower end HDD
ones.
  #6  
Old June 10th 07, 08:25 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Tim Streater
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Camcorder : DVD v HDD

In article ,
wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:05:06 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

In article ,

wrote:

Try:

www.camcorderinfo.com

You want to get a MiniDV model.


Interesting - you have recommended a MiniDV which I had ignored in the
first instance as it has ben around for a long time and I, rightly or
wrongly, considered it to be old technology. Having thought about it,
I am now inclined to go for a MiniDV as you suggested as there seems
to be very good spec ones available for the price of the lower end HDD
ones.


It may be "old" technology, but it's *better* technology than DVD or
HDD, as it does less compression in the camera. You want to do as little
work in the camera as possible, since it has to be done in real time.
When you post-process the video later, you have the advantage of much
more powerful processors and as much time as you need for the
compression software to do a good job.
  #7  
Old June 10th 07, 08:42 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Laurence Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 154
Default Camcorder : DVD v HDD

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:30 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:

It may be "old" technology, but it's *better* technology than DVD or
HDD, as it does less compression in the camera. You want to do as little
work in the camera as possible, since it has to be done in real time.
When you post-process the video later, you have the advantage of much
more powerful processors and as much time as you need for the
compression software to do a good job.


Yeah. And not just "better" the way Betamax was "better" than VHS.
Mini-dv is still very much alive and kicking.
  #8  
Old June 10th 07, 09:10 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
a@aol.com
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Camcorder : DVD v HDD

On Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:25:30 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:


It may be "old" technology, but it's *better* technology than DVD or
HDD, as it does less compression in the camera. You want to do as little
work in the camera as possible, since it has to be done in real time.
When you post-process the video later, you have the advantage of much
more powerful processors and as much time as you need for the
compression software to do a good job.


Thanks guys. Any recommendation for a make, model please? i am looking
for a budget of up to £300.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2012 Digital Video Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.