![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
| |||||||
| UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited. |
|
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Jukka Aho" wrote in message .. . G Hardy wrote: Not to mention that resizing any normal camcorder-shot video in the vertical direction is likely to throw interlacing completely out of whack, leading to stuttering images and whatnot when watching the material on a real tv. I work with MSP which, up until version 7.3 at least, was OK with resizing vertically. It performed its resize on each field separately, then combined the result into a new field-based frame. Yes, some programs allow graceful handling of interlaced material, which is nice. Some others, though, treat everything as if it was progressive frames, which leads to the above-mentioned problems. Then there are those which don't really keep track of the interlaced/non-interlaced status of the video, but may have checkboxes for interlaced processing in the option panels of individual filters and tools, which the user needs to manually select at appropriate times in order to get usable results. (VirtualDub is one of those.) What about Premiere Pro which the OP uses? MSP is a fairly cheap "pro" editor, so if that can gracefully handle field order on resize/respeed, I'd have thought the other big names would do so too... Mind you, as Mitch Hennessey says - "Assumption makes an 'Ass' out of 'U' and ''umption'." |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| G Hardy wrote: Yes, some programs allow graceful handling of interlaced material, What about Premiere Pro which the OP uses? It might, but I'm not sure about that. Even if it does, I don't see the point in this case. Cropping and resizing the clip would make good, healthy parts of the picture (that were originally visible) go off-screen, in the overscan area. It would affect the original framing and composition in unpredictable ways. In other words, it's just a Bad Idea. Masking the offending area, on the other hand (or just leaving it alone since it's probably wholly within the overscan area and thus invisible on a normal tv, anyway), would cause none of that. -- znark |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:16:18 +0300, "Jukka Aho" wrote: Masking the offending area, on the other hand (or just leaving it alone since it's probably wholly within the overscan area and thus invisible on a normal tv, anyway), would cause none of that. Yeah, I'd go for masking. Trouble is, these days you have to accept it WON'T be played on a "normal TV". |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|