A Home Video forum. Digital Video Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Digital Video Banter forum » Digital Video Newsgroups » UK Digital Video
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited.

Long play?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 6th 03, 08:17 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
BillyB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Long play?

Hi All,
Is there any obvious disadvantage in using LP?
Is the digital quality digitally worse in some way? Lower res or bit depth?
If its a digital signal and it works then why use SP?
Are there subtle disadvantages in using LP. For example less reliable or
more likely to go wrong ?
I could imagine that there are "errors" when using the digital media and
that these "errors" are covered up. LP could have more of these.
This would be similar to Audio CD where data can be lost but the CD still
plays. There are "Music quality" CD-Rs that are not error free in normal
operation.
As the signal is uncompressed the reading will not go wrong if the signal is
not digitally perfect.However quality will be compromised.
My impression would be that technology has advanced so the LP is now
possible, but it was not possible when the SP standard was set up.

Should I use LP or SP ?

Ta BB



  #2  
Old August 6th 03, 10:21 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Tony Morgan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default Long play?

In message , BillyB
writes
Hi All,
Is there any obvious disadvantage in using LP?
Is the digital quality digitally worse in some way? Lower res or bit depth?
If its a digital signal and it works then why use SP?
Are there subtle disadvantages in using LP. For example less reliable or
more likely to go wrong ?
I could imagine that there are "errors" when using the digital media and
that these "errors" are covered up. LP could have more of these.
This would be similar to Audio CD where data can be lost but the CD still
plays. There are "Music quality" CD-Rs that are not error free in normal
operation.
As the signal is uncompressed the reading will not go wrong if the signal is
not digitally perfect.However quality will be compromised.
My impression would be that technology has advanced so the LP is now
possible, but it was not possible when the SP standard was set up.

Should I use LP or SP ?


The main disadvantage is that an LP tape is not guaranteed to be
readable on any camcorder other than the one it was recorded on. In fact
it often won't. The quality is down as well, but not significantly.

There can be very few occasions when you need to shoot continuously for
more than 60 minutes, so personally I can't see any valid reason for
using LP at all. Worse though, if you're camcorder goes belly-up then
all the shots you have recorded in LP might not be recoverable - which
for me is a sound reason to never record in LP.
--
Tony Morgan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2012 Digital Video Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.