A Home Video forum. Digital Video Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Digital Video Banter forum » Digital Video Newsgroups » UK Digital Video
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited.

Tags: ,

Mini Dv Question?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 13th 05, 05:56 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Stuart McKears
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 250
Default Mini Dv Question?

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:25:56 +0100, Laurence Payne
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:34:24 +0100, Stuart McKears
wrote:

IIRC, the basic reason is that LP is reading/writing the same amount of data
onto a smaller piece(length) of tape. Errors of any sort - data, head alignment
and/or tape defects - are all magnified. The camera software will, I suspect,
have built in error correction routines for things like head alignment which are
marginally incompatible with other cameras.


I suspect the first half of your reply is accurate. The second half
is fanciful.


All the video cameras I know about have advanced error correction but none of
them use LP mode so it could be "fanciful" for LP mode :-)
Stuart

www.mckears.com
www.oldfart.tv - have your say about the state of UK Television
Ads
  #12  
Old April 13th 05, 06:16 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Stuart McKears
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 250
Default Mini Dv Question?

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:40:28 +0100, Tony Morgan
wrote:

In message , Laurence Payne
writes
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 22:34:24 +0100, Stuart McKears
wrote:

IIRC, the basic reason is that LP is reading/writing the same amount of data
onto a smaller piece(length) of tape. Errors of any sort - data, head
alignment
and/or tape defects - are all magnified. The camera software will, I suspect,
have built in error correction routines for things like head alignment
which are
marginally incompatible with other cameras.


I suspect the first half of your reply is accurate. The second half
is fanciful.


Indeed. Record LP video on one particular model, and then replaying on
another identical model camcorder can be problematic. I hardly think
that they'd have different software (firmware) across a single model
production run.


Actually, just like the bios in a computer, the software version can differ over
a "single model production run" depending on how you define "run" - a days
output, a months, a years, etc etc. Certainly, for the prosumer cameras upwards,
the cameras software will be tweaked during quality control.

However, that's not what I said (well tried to say anyway) what it was meant to
mean was that the same error correction software on one camera in a range can
fail on a pre-recorded tape from another camera in the same range because it's
already correcting for an error in the host camera.

(Pedantic note: substitute firmware for software if you feel like it)

Stuart

www.mckears.com
www.oldfart.tv - have your say about the state of UK Television
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2008 Digital Video Banter, part of the NewsgroupBanter project.
The comments are property of their posters.
Top Game Tips - Personal Loans - The eBay Song - Loans - Teen Chat