![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
| |||||||
| UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Hi, I'm new to all this having never owned a camcorder. I'm wanting to do two things: 1 - make dvds of my newborn son for relatives. 2 - record live bands in dark/loud venues (a reasonable sound/picture, doesn't have to be cd quality!). Any advice for a good quality camera for 1000 pounds that could do both? I've read http://camcord.info/buying/ so will go with minidv, just not sure about the lowlight advice because of my live band requirement. I'm going to be using a dell inspiron 9300 laptop for editing, haven't decided on the software yet either. Any advice much appreciated as I don't really know where to start! thanks in advance, Charlie |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Charlie" wrote in message ... Hi, I'm new to all this having never owned a camcorder. I'm wanting to do two things: 1 - make dvds of my newborn son for relatives. 2 - record live bands in dark/loud venues (a reasonable sound/picture, doesn't have to be cd quality!). Any advice for a good quality camera for 1000 pounds that could do both? I've read http://camcord.info/buying/ so will go with minidv, just not sure about the lowlight advice because of my live band requirement. I'm going to be using a dell inspiron 9300 laptop for editing, haven't decided on the software yet either. Any advice much appreciated as I don't really know where to start! thanks in advance, Just a few words of advice Charlie (I´m sure you will get many more from different angles): However much you love your new Son, remember, even the greatest Video Producers in the world could only do so much with the theme "baby". So I really would recommend that after many hours of shooting footage, you edit it down remorselessly: A few minutes of really good stuff will be far better than subjecting your "audience" to an hour or more of your loved one´s every move. As for the live band. Every one I´ve done has been a great improvement on my previous efforts: Here are a few short cuts for you: Record the sound separately if at all possible (i.e. via mini disk or whatever - don´t rely on the camcorder´s mic). For reasons of continuity any live gig production is fas superior when shot on two cameras - if you only have the one try borrowing or shooting as a pair with a friend. Only this way can you save yourself a lot of hassle trying to stitch together incongruent sections of different tracks or worse still, having your production look really amateur by jumping about between shots with no continuity. Rob Charlie |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Just a few words of advice Charlie (I´m sure you will get many more from different angles): However much you love your new Son, remember, even the greatest Video Producers in the world could only do so much with the theme "baby". So I really would recommend that after many hours of shooting footage, you edit it down remorselessly: A few minutes of really good stuff will be far better than subjecting your "audience" to an hour or more of your loved one´s every move. As for the live band. Every one I´ve done has been a great improvement on my previous efforts: Here are a few short cuts for you: Record the sound separately if at all possible (i.e. via mini disk or whatever - don´t rely on the camcorder´s mic). For reasons of continuity any live gig production is fas superior when shot on two cameras - if you only have the one try borrowing or shooting as a pair with a friend. Only this way can you save yourself a lot of hassle trying to stitch together incongruent sections of different tracks or worse still, having your production look really amateur by jumping about between shots with no continuity. Rob Thanks for the advice... I'll try and keep baby videos short and sweet, maybe the length of a music video even! For live music, I've got a hard disk recorder so I can try that then its just down to finding two cameras now. Any ideas on makes/models of cameras that would be good? thanks a lot, Charlie |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Charlie" wrote in message ... snip Any ideas on makes/models of cameras that would be good? If you ask 50 folks in this NG about which is a good camera, you´ll get about a dozen different answers (maybe a lot more)! You should stick with digital and unless cost is no object, that probably means Mini-DV. Lots of folks here seem happy with Sony - I know I am; I have a PC100E (no longer in production), which has during the past 5 or 6 years, given me incredible service: It has been half way round the world and suffered all manner of non-camera-friendly conditions from Rain Forest to Middle Eastern Desert, Swamps, Mountain Tops, Ice, Snow, Temperatures of minus 25, etc. etc. It has survived being dropped and slammed against rock faces during numerous URD´s ("unplanned rapid descents"), Fallen from a 4WD onto compacted sand at 50 degrees plus in a dust storm, It has been in contact with enough water to send its designers screaming for cover....and only when I accidentally drenched it in seawater did it need any kind of repair (new main circuit board - covered by insurance). You´ve probably guesssed that my main line of action is *not* the live bands :-) Those I do mainly for fun, favours for friends and to make a few bob from doing promo DVDs for unknown bands. My specialisation is Wildlife & Adventure Travel video. Hence all the crap the camera gets! Contrast that with my Brother in Law´s JVC experience - he´s had no less than 3 in the time I´ve had the aforementioned Sony - the last one only because the warranty wouldn´t allow him to select an alternative make! (He wouldn´t touch JVC with a bargepole again). I have nothing personal about JVC, but my B-I-L´s cameras have all been really flimsy and plasticky to hold, obviously unreliable (despite being used only in a domestic situation), and not upto any kind of hard usage. It should be pointed out that Sony, like most other manufacturers, make a range of devices of varying quality and to suit varying purposes. I´m sure there are quite likely to be models in the Sony range which could be of a lesser standard than I have been "lucky"(?) to experience - and quite possibly, JVC models of a better standard than I have described here. Just be careful what you choose and get as much info from actual users as you can on the models you are considering. I´m quite surprised noone else has chipped in with advice for you yet Charlie, so if you have any more questions please feel free. Rob thanks a lot, Charlie |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|