![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
| |||||||
| UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited. |
|
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:31:56 +0100, "RSD" wrote: I suspect you are under the misapprehension that MiniDisk offers a "bulk dump" data transfer function. It doesn't. You have to play the sound in real time whether it's going to the computer by analogue or digital cable. It doesn´t have to go in real time! You're speaking of NetMD? Have you seen a MD machine that has it? Have you used it to transfer audio? What speed advantage did you achieve? Hi-MD as mentioned both by myself and another contibutor to this thread! Yes, Yes, e.g. 5 mins of Audio transfers in seconds. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| In message , Laurence Payne writes On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:31:56 +0100, "RSD" wrote: I suspect you are under the misapprehension that MiniDisk offers a "bulk dump" data transfer function. It doesn't. You have to play the sound in real time whether it's going to the computer by analogue or digital cable. It doesn´t have to go in real time! You're speaking of NetMD? Have you seen a MD machine that has it? Have you used it to transfer audio? What speed advantage did you achieve? I use NetMD extensively, using BeatJam on my Sharp IM-DR410 pocket MiniDisk. Using AC-3 LP4 I can transfer 320 minutes in about eight minutes. Using LP2 takes five minutes. As you suggested, there is an issue because at the PC side you have to use .omg files, which impose a restriction of three copies before being locked out. You can reset the lockout by transferring in the reverse direction (each time you "goback" you release one more copy). The NetMD physical link, BTW, uses USB-2. If your PC port is USB-1 the transfer time is longer. There is, BTW, an optical link on the Sharp, but I have never tried using that. Whether the same restriction applies I can't say. -- Tony Morgan http://www.camcord.info |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Tony Morgan wrote: In message , Laurence Payne writes On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:31:56 +0100, "RSD" wrote: I suspect you are under the misapprehension that MiniDisk offers a "bulk dump" data transfer function. It doesn't. You have to play the sound in real time whether it's going to the computer by analogue or digital cable. It doesn´t have to go in real time! You're speaking of NetMD? Have you seen a MD machine that has it? Have you used it to transfer audio? What speed advantage did you achieve? I use NetMD extensively, using BeatJam on my Sharp IM-DR410 pocket MiniDisk. Using AC-3 LP4 I can transfer 320 minutes in about eight minutes. Using LP2 takes five minutes. As you suggested, there is an issue because at the PC side you have to use .omg files, which impose a restriction of three copies before being locked out. You can reset the Which is ludicrous in the extreme (and I suspect as useless as it is ludicrous) if the recordings in question are my own live recordings which I want to edit on the PC. lockout by transferring in the reverse direction (each time you "goback" you release one more copy). The NetMD physical link, BTW, uses USB-2. If your PC port is USB-1 the transfer time is longer. There is, BTW, an optical link on the Sharp, but I have never tried using that. Whether the same restriction applies I can't say. I gather that HiMD is a better way to go..... best to wait till prices drop, I suspect. -- Please use the corrected version of the address below for replies. Replies to the header address will be junked, as will mail from various domains listed at www.scottsonline.org.uk regards. Mike Scott Harlow Essex England.(unet -a-t- scottsonline.org.uk) |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:33:57 +0100, "RSD" wrote: You're speaking of NetMD? Have you seen a MD machine that has it? Have you used it to transfer audio? What speed advantage did you achieve? Hi-MD as mentioned both by myself and another contibutor to this thread! Yes, Yes, e.g. 5 mins of Audio transfers in seconds. OK, I appear to have done a Tony Morgan on this one! NetMD is obviously now mainstream and working well. I hope I wasn't too rude :-) |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| In message , Mike Scott writes Snipped... Which is ludicrous in the extreme (and I suspect as useless as it is ludicrous) I'd suggest you read my post in the context that it was posted instead of going off half-cocked .... -- Tony Morgan http://www.camcord.info |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:33:57 +0100, "RSD" wrote: You're speaking of NetMD? Have you seen a MD machine that has it? Have you used it to transfer audio? What speed advantage did you achieve? Hi-MD as mentioned both by myself and another contibutor to this thread! Yes, Yes, e.g. 5 mins of Audio transfers in seconds. OK, I appear to have done a Tony Morgan on this one! NetMD is obviously now mainstream and working well. I hope I wasn't too rude :-) Not at all Laurence. Rob |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| "Mike Scott" wrote in message ... Sorry this is rather OT, although it's not altogether irrelevant to digital video. A friend has raised the issue of digital audio recording onto something pocket-sized, with a fast copy back to PC ready for recording to CD. The aim is to record choir practices and be able to edit these down quickly to play on a stereo system (eg for learning while driving). The original idea was to use a minidisk, but afaics from the manuals, and from the net, these all have digital audio transfer back to PC inhibited for protection of commercial materials. The only reasonably-priced MP3 recorders I've seen have been low audio quality. It's been tried and it's not really feasible to do the copying back in real time - it just takes too long. Does anyone have any ideas and solutions here please? Maybe I've got hold of totally the wrong end of the stick; but I'd not advise on buying anything unless sure it'd solve the problem! (At the back of my mind too is to be able to have a separate sound recording for editing into home videos, but that's another story......) Thanks in advance for any comments. -- Please use the corrected version of the address below for replies. Replies to the header address will be junked, as will mail from various domains listed at www.scottsonline.org.uk regards. Mike Scott Harlow Essex England.(unet -a-t- scottsonline.org.uk) I have been looking at some of the tiny portable recording studio now avaliable, whilst not exactly pocket size might be exactly what you are looking for. |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| "Headrush Films UK" wrote in message ... "Mike Scott" wrote in message ... Sorry this is rather OT, although it's not altogether irrelevant to digital video. A friend has raised the issue of digital audio recording onto something pocket-sized, with a fast copy back to PC ready for recording to CD. The aim is to record choir practices and be able to edit these down quickly to play on a stereo system (eg for learning while driving). The original idea was to use a minidisk, but afaics from the manuals, and from the net, these all have digital audio transfer back to PC inhibited for protection of commercial materials. The only reasonably-priced MP3 recorders I've seen have been low audio quality. It's been tried and it's not really feasible to do the copying back in real time - it just takes too long. Does anyone have any ideas and solutions here please? Maybe I've got hold of totally the wrong end of the stick; but I'd not advise on buying anything unless sure it'd solve the problem! (At the back of my mind too is to be able to have a separate sound recording for editing into home videos, but that's another story......) Thanks in advance for any comments. -- Please use the corrected version of the address below for replies. Replies to the header address will be junked, as will mail from various domains listed at www.scottsonline.org.uk regards. Mike Scott Harlow Essex England.(unet -a-t- scottsonline.org.uk) I have been looking at some of the tiny portable recording studio now avaliable, whilst not exactly pocket size might be exactly what you are looking for. Just found the Korg pxr4 http://www.dv247.com/invt/11949?sour...gn=uk&ad=11949 |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| Headrush Films UK wrote: .... I have been looking at some of the tiny portable recording studio now avaliable, whilst not exactly pocket size might be exactly what you are looking for. Just found the Korg pxr4 http://www.dv247.com/invt/11949?sour...gn=uk&ad=11949 mpeg1 though??? But looks possible. Thanks for the note. -- Please use the corrected version of the address below for replies. Replies to the header address will be junked, as will mail from various domains listed at www.scottsonline.org.uk regards. Mike Scott Harlow Essex England.(unet -a-t- scottsonline.org.uk) |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|