A Home Video forum. Digital Video Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Digital Video Banter forum » Digital Video Newsgroups » UK Digital Video
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited.

Image stabiliser questions



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old January 25th 05, 08:11 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Deep Reset
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 44
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)


":::Jerry::::" wrote in message
...

"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:11:55 -0000, ":::Jerry::::"
wrote:

True. But most people with clue will carry a bag to fill and hang to
increase the "weight" without humping that weight around. That's why
it's best to buy a tripod with a centre brace to keep the centre of
gravity low when hanging the bag. But by far the most important thing
(for video) is to have a fluid action head.


Tony, you really are a clueless moron.... :~(


Why? Because he said "weight" (why the quote marks?) when he meant
mass?


Hanging something from a tripod is liable to make it even more unstable,
especially if it is able to swing (which by definition it will be). You
want
a stable mass, preferably as low as possible, not an unstable hanging
weight
IYSWIM.


Ahem. Rock slings are common accessories amongst twitchers. Usually they
have three attachment slings
and hang low on the tripod, allowing the mass of the rocks to stabilise
their high powered spotting scopes.

The best thing of course is to use a half decent tripod that has some
weight
in the first place !


Agreed.



  #32  
Old January 26th 05, 08:38 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Lou van Wijhe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)

"Tony Morgan" schreef in bericht
...
In message , Chris R
writes

"Tony Morgan" wrote in message
...
In message , Chris R
writes
Snipped...

Now I wonder what these new fangled carbon fibre tripods are are
like.........

Great for fishing?
--
Tony Morgan
http://www.camcord.info

Yes I suspect that if tripods are light enough to carry easily they
probably
are not heavy enough!

True. But most people with clue will carry a bag to fill and hang to
increase the "weight" without humping that weight around. That's why it's
best to buy a tripod with a centre brace to keep the centre of gravity low
when hanging the bag. But by far the most important thing (for video) is
to have a fluid action head.


Tony,

Looking for fluid heads info on the Internet, I found a *motorised* one for
$ 125
(http://www.21best.com/21_best/electr...for_sale_.html,
the one at the top left). Wouldn't this be an interesting alternative?
--
Lou van Wijhe
Website: http://home.hccnet.nl/jl.van.wijhe/
AntiSpam: Vervang INVALID in e-mail adres door NL
AntiSpam: Replace INVALID in e-mail address by NL


  #33  
Old January 26th 05, 08:47 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Tony Morgan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,046
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)

In message , Lou van
Wijhe writes
Snipped...

Looking for fluid heads info on the Internet, I found a *motorised* one
for $ 125
(http://www.21best.com/21_best/electr...an_tilt/for_sa
le_.html, the one at the top left). Wouldn't this be an interesting
alternative?


Indeed. Thanks for the link. The IR remote for just a few dollars more
seems attractive also.

I might raid my piggy-bank soon :-)
--
Tony Morgan
http://www.camcord.info
  #34  
Old January 26th 05, 09:10 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
:::Jerry::::
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 546
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)


"Lou van Wijhe" wrote in message
. nl...
snip

Looking for fluid heads info on the Internet, I found a *motorised* one

for
$ 125

(http://www.21best.com/21_best/electr...tilt/for_sale_.
html,
the one at the top left). Wouldn't this be an interesting alternative?


Is that for video use or security use, if the latter then the head movement
might not be that smooth.


  #35  
Old January 26th 05, 09:35 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Lou van Wijhe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)

":::Jerry::::" schreef in bericht
...

"Lou van Wijhe" wrote in message
. nl...
snip

Looking for fluid heads info on the Internet, I found a *motorised* one

for
$ 125

(http://www.21best.com/21_best/electr...tilt/for_sale_.
html,
the one at the top left). Wouldn't this be an interesting alternative?


Is that for video use or security use, if the latter then the head
movement
might not be that smooth.


The website of the manufacturer (www.bescor.com) says the unit is QUOTE to
be fastened between any tripod head and video camera. Two motors allow
independent smooth remote adjustment of vertical and horizontal panning
motion. UNQUOTE

To me, this sounds like video use, not security use. By the way, I didn't
find any mention of a European distributor so the unit would have to be
imported from the States, eventually.
--
Lou van Wijhe
Website: http://home.hccnet.nl/jl.van.wijhe/
AntiSpam: Vervang INVALID in e-mail adres door NL
AntiSpam: Replace INVALID in e-mail address by NL


  #36  
Old January 26th 05, 10:02 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Laurence Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 387
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:38:40 +0100, "Lou van Wijhe"
wrote:

Looking for fluid heads info on the Internet, I found a *motorised* one for
$ 125
(http://www.21best.com/21_best/electr...for_sale_.html,
the one at the top left). Wouldn't this be an interesting alternative?


I doubt it's very responsive. OK for a leisurely sweep of a security
camera.
  #37  
Old January 26th 05, 10:09 AM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
:::Jerry::::
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 546
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)


"Lou van Wijhe" wrote in message
.nl...
":::Jerry::::" schreef in bericht
...

"Lou van Wijhe" wrote in message
. nl...
snip

Looking for fluid heads info on the Internet, I found a *motorised* one

for
$ 125


(http://www.21best.com/21_best/electr...tilt/for_sale_.
html,
the one at the top left). Wouldn't this be an interesting alternative?


Is that for video use or security use, if the latter then the head
movement
might not be that smooth.


The website of the manufacturer (www.bescor.com) says the unit is QUOTE to
be fastened between any tripod head and video camera. Two motors allow
independent smooth remote adjustment of vertical and horizontal panning
motion. UNQUOTE

To me, this sounds like video use, not security use. By the way, I didn't
find any mention of a European distributor so the unit would have to be
imported from the States, eventually.


Err, try browsing www.b-hague.co.uk/

Looks like it might even be the same unit.... :~)


  #38  
Old January 26th 05, 01:40 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
Laurence Payne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 387
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:35:40 +0100, "Lou van Wijhe"
wrote:

The website of the manufacturer (www.bescor.com) says the unit is QUOTE to
be fastened between any tripod head and video camera. Two motors allow
independent smooth remote adjustment of vertical and horizontal panning
motion. UNQUOTE

To me, this sounds like video use, not security use.


Here's more of what they say.
....................
Motorized Pan and Tilt head for remote control of video cameras,
digital cameras or security cameras. Item Number: MP-101

Supports cameras up to 6 lbs, + and - 15 degree Vertical tilt, 30
degree total.+ and - 90 degree Horizontal pan, 180 degree total.

Pan speed 3 to 12 degrees per second
.....................

7.5 seconds to pan 90 degrees. Good enough for what you need?


  #39  
Old January 26th 05, 03:50 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
:::Jerry::::
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 546
Default Tripods (was Image stabiliser questions)


"Laurence Payne" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:35:40 +0100, "Lou van Wijhe"
wrote:

The website of the manufacturer (www.bescor.com) says the unit is QUOTE

to
be fastened between any tripod head and video camera. Two motors allow
independent smooth remote adjustment of vertical and horizontal panning
motion. UNQUOTE

To me, this sounds like video use, not security use.


Here's more of what they say.
...................
Motorized Pan and Tilt head for remote control of video cameras,
digital cameras or security cameras. Item Number: MP-101

Supports cameras up to 6 lbs, + and - 15 degree Vertical tilt, 30
degree total.+ and - 90 degree Horizontal pan, 180 degree total.

Pan speed 3 to 12 degrees per second
....................

7.5 seconds to pan 90 degrees. Good enough for what you need?


I suspect they will be useful for remote shots or effect pans and tilts, I
would hate to try an follow someone with it IYSWIM.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2012 Digital Video Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.