A Home Video forum. Digital Video Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Digital Video Banter forum » Digital Video Newsgroups » UK Digital Video
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

UK Digital Video (uk.rec.video.digital) For the discussion of all aspects of digital video, including all digital video formats, camera use, editing, post production & all associated equipment, hardware and software. Advertising is prohibited.

Biting the back-up bullet



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 4th 04, 08:47 PM posted to uk.rec.video.digital
John Russell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 383
Default Biting the back-up bullet


"John Russell" wrote in message
...

"Tumbleweed" wrote in message
.. .

"Tony Morgan" wrote in message
...
In message , Tumbleweed
writes
Snipped....

but I'm
waiting for something that does what you say using a *physical*

image
backup/restore. Or are you simply trying to start an argument?
--
Norton Ghost or Drive Image (though I have never used the latter)

will
do this,

No they do NOT. They both image the directory/files and not the

physical
clusters/sectors. And that is the reason that you can restore to any
filesystem (within the constraints of the same OS)..

I've used NG several times to recover from a virus, from a few

software
screwups, and to xfer my C drive to a larger disk. Whatever is on the
disk being restored to is irrelevant, whether its empty or has a FAT,
FAT32 or EXT3 file system.

Exactly. But if you have an image based on cluster/sector then you can
be in deep trouble.

I'd perhaps remind you that this dispute was because I challenged
someone who suggested that a physical (aka cluster/sector) backup was
made in preference to a logical (aka directory/file) backup.


Dont they go down a bit deeper, in that they copy stuff such as boot

sectors
(maybe thats the only thing they copy that meets this criteria that isnt

a
'file'.

Here is a link for an old article on benefits of using imaging over file
backups.
http://www.m-support.co.uk/BEI.htm

Of course to a certain other gentleman this article is load of crap and
products such as Drive Image, Ghost and Acronis true image are really file
backup systems in disguise!



P.S. for those who can't be bothered to read it here is the crux quote:-

"Image backup is a process which completely backs up a physical hard drive
on a bit-by-bit basis. The image backup process typically does not care what
is on the hard drive or even what the hard drive is doing at time of backup!
The backup process simply starts at the first block and reads every
cylinder, track and sector until every bit on the drive has been backed up.
This method of backup does not see partitions, files or any other arbitrary
file system structures. A true "image" is captured on the output media."


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2012 Digital Video Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.