"Tony Morgan" wrote in message
...
In message , John Russell
writes
Snipped...

And if I remember correctly, the onus is on the manufacturer/retailer to
prove "abnormal" use, not on you to prove "normal" use.

Is that why the SCCs are overwhelmed with claims for goods which have
failed outside the warranty period?

Not...

It's noteworthy that the Sale of Goods act provides recourse against the
retailer - not the manufacturer (unless you purchased directly from the
manufacturer).
--
Tony Morgan
http://www.camcord.info

There should be a course to teach people how to post an opposite view with
out being "aggressive" in tone!